Across marine environments, plastic is often eaten rather than avoided. Sea turtles mistake bags for jellyfish; seabirds pick bright fragments and feed them to chicks; fish and invertebrates ingest microplastics suspended in the water column or settled in sediments. In this article, we unpack how ingestion harms animals—from the gut to the entire population. You’ll learn the mechanisms behind injury and starvation, the role of chemicals and bioaccumulation, and why preventing ocean plastic upstream matters.

Mistaken identity

Many species use vision and smell to find prey. Floating bags, films, and foams mimic natural cues—jellyfish for turtles, fish eggs for seabirds, zooplankton-like particles for filter feeders. In turbid waters or at night, shape and contrast override caution, leading to ingestion. Once swallowed, plastics can lodge in the oesophagus or stomach, abrade tissues, and reduce the space available for real food. The problem spans sizes: from macroplastics that block the gut to microplastics that pass but still interact with tissues and microbiomes.

Blockages and starvation

Rigid fragments, caps, lighters, and monofilaments tangle and compact into bezoars that obstruct digestion. Animals feel “full” but receive no energy, entering a starvation spiral. Even partial obstruction slows gut transit, reducing assimilation of nutrients and water. Ulcerations and perforations raise infection risk; compromised individuals struggle to dive, evade predators, or migrate. In colonies or schools, these sublethal effects scale up to lower breeding success and survival.

Chemical load

Plastics contain additives (plasticizers, flame retardants, stabilizers) and act as carriers for hydrophobic pollutants that sorb to their surfaces in the sea. During residence in the gut, some additives and contaminants can transfer to tissues, adding to the animal’s chemical burden. While transfer rates vary by polymer, particle size, temperature, and gut chemistry, the direction of risk is clear: ingestion increases exposure potential, with endocrine and developmental effects particularly concerning for eggs, larvae, and juveniles.

Energy drain and behavior

Searching for food with a compromised gut costs time and energy. Sublethal ingestion reduces growth and condition, altering buoyancy, foraging ranges, and predator–prey interactions. Seabirds that repeatedly regurgitate plastic to chicks show reduced provisioning of nutritious prey; fish with microplastics in the gut spend more time feeding to compensate, increasing exposure to additional hazards. Over time, these energetic penalties depress individual fitness and, cumulatively, population resilience.

Life stages at risk

Early life stages encounter plastics in nursery habitats—estuaries, bays, and coastal fronts—where marine litter concentrates. Eggs and larvae are sensitive to both physical and chemical stress; juveniles are exploratory feeders and ingest fragments readily. Long-lived species accumulate risks across decades. In benthic systems, microplastics embedded in sediments are ingested by deposit feeders and move up food webs; in pelagic systems, buoyant fragments and fibers are taken by filter feeders and planktivores. The pathway differs, the outcome converges: compromised health.

Ogyre operates on two fronts: in the sea through a Fishing for Litter network of local fishers, and along coastal areas to intercept ocean-bound waste before it reaches marine environments. Collected materials are delivered to certified cooperatives for sorting, recycling, or responsible disposal, always aiming for the most sustainable end-of-life. Each activity is tracked on blockchain to ensure transparency, traceability, and data integrity across the recovery chain. This system supports fishers and local partners with logistical and financial assistance, turning marine litter and coastal debris recovery into shared value within a circular approach that protects the Ocean.

Ingested plastic and microplastics travel through marine food webs. What starts with zooplankton or small fish can move up trophic levels—ultimately reaching seafood on our plates—another reason to prevent plastic from entering the sea in the first place.

Ingestion is not an isolated accident; it is the predictable result of plastic leaking into habitats where animals hunt, filter, and graze. The mechanisms are well-documented: mistaken identity, physical blockage, chemical exposure, and energy penalties that scale to population-level impacts. Action must prioritize upstream prevention and recovery close to sources, guided by circular economy principles and credible tracking. Field programs that work with fishers and coastal partners, coupled with robust end-of-life management and transparent data, reduce the likelihood that plastic becomes a fatal meal—and help restore the Ocean’s capacity to support life.

• 2024 — Global Waste Management Outlook 2024 — United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
• 2022 — OECD Global Plastics Outlook — Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
• 2020 — Impacts of plastic pollution in the ocean on marine species, biodiversity and ecosystems — WWF
• 2021 — Seabed sources of marine litter — Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
• 2023 — Plastics, biodiversity and the circular economy — European Environment Agency (EEA)
• 2019 — Marine litter best practices — UNEP
• 2018 — Mediterraneo in trappola — WWF
• 2023 — COREPLA Report 2023 — Consorzio Nazionale per la Raccolta, il Riciclo e il Recupero degli Imballaggi in Plastica
• 2024 — UN Marine Litter Report — United Nations
• 2023 — Country-specific mismanaged waste: main contributor to marine litter in Europe — European sources
• 2023 — WWF: Stato dei fiumi e focus plastica — WWF Italia
• 2023 — Plastics and biodiversity — EEA
• 2023 — How to address Plastic Pollution — UNEP
• 2022 — Plastic Pollution: WWF, Plastic Credits & Neutrality — WWF
• 2023 — Ogyre Protocol — Ogyre
• 2023 — Ogyre Code of Conduct — Ogyre
• 2024 — EEA: Plastic Impact & EU Circular Economy — EEA